(08-13-2021, 04:49 PM)TobyC Wrote:(08-13-2021, 02:32 AM)GAW9576 Wrote: It has more teeth on the comb. I believe the count is 11 on the regular and 17 on the peerless but I would have to count them again to verify. To me the peerless seems more efficient. I like both though.
I've seen images of the two side by side, I didn't know one was a "Peerless". I don't know what the peerless sets were all about, I thought it was just a marketing thing to sell more stuff. Special box, different handle, cool name, just to catch consumer interest.
(08-13-2021, 04:55 PM)TobyC Wrote:(08-13-2021, 01:08 PM)Flintstone Wrote: Funny you should ask -- I haven't picked up a "new to me" razor in quite a while, but I have a peerless winging it's way through the mail, even as I type this -- at least I hope it is. I've been curious about the Peerless for a while, as I've heard some other folks mention that they prefer it to the "regular". I'm not optimistic that I'll be able to tell a difference, but I do harbor some hope that it may raise the Clog-Pruf's ranking a bit in the den. When it comes in, it will definitely be showing up on Micromatic Monday.
In a blindfold test, could you tell the difference between the Micromatic and the Clog-Pruf? I don't think I could.
Probably was just something to get people to buy a new razor although the I believe the Peerless is more efficient than the standard Clog-Pruf. However I have no real way of determining if it is all in my head or actually in the shave quality. I have long felt an affectve placebo effect is still effective.
I would like to think I could. I don't plan on shaving blindfolded to find out though.